Abram, S., & Luther, J. (2004). Born with the chip. Library Journal, 129(8), 34-37. http://lj.libraryjournal.com/2004/05/ljarchives/born-with-the-chip/
ACRL (Association of College & Research Libraries). (2015). Framework for information literacy for higher education. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework.
Barry, C. L. (1994). User-defined relevance criteria: An exploratory study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(3), 149-159. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199404)45:3<149::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-J
Carlson, J. (2006). An examination of undergraduate student citation behavior. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(1), 14-22. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2005.10.001
Cataldo, T. T., & Buhler, A. G. (2012). Positively perplexing E-books: Digital natives’ perceptions of electronic information resources. Charleston Conference, Charleston, SC. doi:10.5703/1288284315106
Clydesdale, T. (2009). Wake up and smell the new epistemology. Chronicle of Higher Education, Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/Wake-UpSmell-the-New/4568.
Cole, A., Napier, T., & Marcum, B. (2015). Generation Z: Information facts and fiction. Not just where to click: Teaching students how to think about information (pp. 107-137). Chicago, IL: Association of College and Research Libraries.
Connaway, L.S., Lanclos, D.M., and Hood, E.M. 2013a. “’I Always Stick With the First Thing That Comes Up on Google…’ Where People Go for Information, What They Use, and Why.” EDUCAUSE Review Online, December 6. http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/i-always-stick-first-thing-comes-google-where-people-go-information-what-they-use-and-why.
Connaway, L.S., Lanclos, D.M., and Hood, E.M. 2013b. “’I Find Google a Lot Easier Than Going to the Library Website.’ Imagine Ways to Innovate and Inspire Students to Use the Academic Library.” Paper presented at the Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL) 2013 conference, Indianapolis, Indiana, April 11. http://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/activities/vandr/presentations/acrl-vandr2013.pptx and http://www.slideshare.net/oclcr/i-find-google-a-lot-easier-than-going-to-the-library-website-imagine-ways-to-innovate-and-inspire-students-to-use-the-academic-library-20497579.
Connaway, L.S., Lanclos, D.M., and White, D. 2012. “Some People Visit the Web, Some People Live There: The Effect of Online Residency on Digital Literacies.” Presented at EDUCAUSE 2012, Denver, Colorado, November 9.
Connaway, L.S., Lanclos, D.M., and White, D. 2014. “Evaluating Online Behaviors: A Visitors and Residents Approach.” Webinar presented by OCLC Research, Dublin, Ohio, July 15. http://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/presentations/connaway/connaway-white-lanclos-evaluating-online-jisc-2014.pptx and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBtEqb-rVfM&feature=youtu.be and http://www.slideshare.net/oclcr/evaluating-online-behaviours-a-visitors-and-residents-approach.
Connaway, L.S., Lanclos, D.M., White, D., Le Cornu, A., and Hood, E.M. 2012. “User-centered Decision Making: A New Model for Developing Academic Library Services and Systems.” Presented at the IFLA World Library and Information Congress 2012, Helsinki, Finland, August 11-17. http://www.oclc.org/resources/research/activities/vandr/presentations/ifla-081212.pptx and http://www.slideshare.net/LynnConnaway/ifla-081212-31721032.
Connaway, L.S., White, D., Lanclos, D.M., and Le Cornu, A. 2012. “Visitors and Residents: What Motivates Engagement with the Digital Information Environment?” Presented at the ISIC 2012 Conference, Tokyo, Japan, September 5-7. http://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/presentations/connaway/connaway-lanclos-white-vandr-isic-2012.pptx and http://www.slideshare.net/LynnConnaway/visitors-and-residents-what-motivates-engagement-with-the-digital-information-environment-36883342.
Croft, R. (2004). eBooks for a distributed learning university the royal roads university case. Journal of Library Administration, 41(1-2), 113-137.
Fei, Y., Sullivan, J., & Woodall, L. (2006). What can students' bibliographies tell us? - evidence based information skills teaching. Evidence Based Library & Information Practice, 1(2), 12-22.
Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2010). Kids and credibility: An empirical examination of youth, digital media use, and information credibility, MIT Press.
Grimes, D. J., & Boening, C. H. (2001). Worries with the web: A look at student use of web resources. College & Research Libraries, 62(1), 11-23.
Groves, R.M., Fowler, F.J., Couper, M.P., Lepkowski, J.M., Singer, E., & Tourangeau, R. (2009). Survey Methodology, Wiley.
Head, A. (2013). Learning the ropes: How freshmen conduct course research once they enter college. Project Information Literacy. Retrieved from http://projectinfolit.org/pdfs/PIL_2013_FreshmenStudy_report_no_appendices.pdf.
Hilligoss, B., & Rieh, S. Y. (2008). Developing a unifying framework of credibility assessment: Construct, heuristics, and interaction in context. Information Processing & Management, 44(4), 1467-1484. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2007.10.001.
Hirsh, S. G. (1999). Children's relevance criteria and information seeking on electronic resources. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(14), 1265.
Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Personal epistemology : The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. Mahwah, N.J: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Julien, H., & Barker, S. (2009). How high-school students find and evaluate scientific information: A basis for information literacy skills development. Library & Information Science Research, 31(1), 12-17. doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2008.10.008.
Kafai, Y., & Bates, M. J. (1997). Internet web-searching instruction in the elementary classroom: Building a foundation for information literacy. School Library Media Quarterly, 25(2), 103.
Large, A., Beheshti, J., & Moukdad, H. (1999). Information seeking on the web: Navigational skills of grade-six primary school students. Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting, 36, 84.
Levine-Clark, M. (2006). Electronic book usage: A survey at the university of denver. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 6(3), 285-299. doi:10.1353/pla.2006.0041.
McPherson, A. C., Gofine, M. L., & Stinson, J. (2014). Seeing Is Believing? A Mixed-Methods Study Exploring the Quality and Perceived Trustworthiness of Online Information About Chronic Conditions Aimed at Children and Young People. Health Communication, 29(5), 473-482. doi:10.1080/10410236.2013.768325.
Meyers, E. M. (2010). Cognitive Authority in Everyday Life: From Small Worlds to Virtual Worlds. Knowledge Quest, 38(3), 48-51.
Mirtz, R. (2013). Encountering library databases: NextGen students' strategies for reconciling personal topics and academic scholarship. In R. McClure, & J. Purdy (Eds.), New digital scholar: Exploring and enriching the research and writing practices of nextgen students. Medford, NJ: Information Today.
Palmer, S., & Tucker, B. (2004). Planning, delivery and evaluation of information literacy training for engineering and technology students. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 35(1), 16-34.
Primary Research Group. (2009). The survey of american college students: Student use of library e-book collections. Primary Research Group.
Rieh, S. Y. (2002). Judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(2), 145-161. doi:10.1002/asi.10017.
Shelburne, W. A. (2009). E-book usage in an academic library: User attitudes and behaviors. Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services, 33(2/3), 59-72.
Soules, A. (2009). E-books and user assumptions. Serials, 22(3), S1-S5.
Swanson, T. A., & Jagman, H. (2015). Not just where to click : Teaching students how to think about information. Chicago, Illinois: Association of College and Research Libraries.
Taylor, A. (2012). A study of the information search behaviour of the millennial generation. Information Research-an International Electronic Journal, 17(1).
Turner, V., Gantz, J.F., Reinsel, D. and Minton, S. (2014). EMC Digital Universe study. http://www.emc.com/leadership/digital-universe/index.htm.
Walsh, A. (2009). Information literacy assessment: Where do we start? Journal of Librarianship & Information Science, 41(1), 19-28.
Wang, P., & Soergel, D. (1998). A cognitive model of document use during a research project. study I. document selection. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(2), 115-133. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199802)49:2<115::AID-ASI3>3.0.CO;2-T.
White, D. S., and Le Cornu, A. (2011). “Visitors and Residents: A New Typology for Online Engagement.” First Monday 16(9). http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/3171/3049.
Wildemuth, B. M. (2009). Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science. Westport, Conn: Libraries Unlimited.
Williams, P., & Rowlands, I. (2007). Information behaviour of the researcher of the future: The literature on young people and their information behaviour. British Library/JISC. Retrieved from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/reppres/ggworkpackageii.pdf.