Skip to main content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

Assessing E-Books Cost & Usage: How e-Books Cost & Usage Varies by Acquisitions Methods Across Subject Disciplines: Home

Introduction

A multi-departmental team of three librarians at the University of Florida presented the results of an e-book analytical project as a poster on April 11th at the 2013 ACRL conference. This LibGuide offers summary information on the project, as well as a view (see below) of the poster presented detailing information from the cost and cost per use of various acquisitions methods. This project is still a work in progress with the short-term goal of issuing a journal article. The information contained within this LibGuide will continually be revised as the project moves forward.

Please check back often for updates.

 

Project Overview:

Librarians at the University of Florida  have launched a research project to assess usage and cost-per-use of e-books acquired through three purchasing models: (1)  e-books made accessible and/or acquired through Patron-Driven Acquisitions programs (PDA); (2) e-books purchased in large publisher packages; (3) and e-books received title-by-title via firm orders and approval/slip plans. Librarians are also examining how e-books usage varies across three broad areas of subject disciplines: (1) Science-Technology-Engineering-Mathematics (STEM); (2) Medicine; (3) Humanities & Social Sciences.

 

We welcome your feedback and comments. We especially would like to hear from librarians who are conducting or proposing similar research. 

Assessing E-Books Cost & Usage: How e-Books Cost & Usage Varies by Acquisitions Methods Across Subject Disciplines

University of Florida Home Page

This page uses Google Analytics - (Google Privacy Policy)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.