What type of article are you looking for or looking at?
These categories are not rigid and some of them overlap. Here are some characteristics to help identify the article type:
Open Access (OA)
Research articles:
Peer reviewed (or Refereed) articles:
PrePrint articles:
Review articles:
Conference papers:
Technical reports: (not peer reviewed)
Trade publication articles: (not peer reviewed)
Popular articles: (not peer reviewed)
Websites, press releases, encyclopedia entries:
Q. What is peer review?
A. For an article to be published in an academic journal, it must be examined by experts in the field. They determine whether the information is reliable, well researched, and of interest to others who study that subject. Click on image for 5 min video explanation of peer review from North Carolina State University.
Q. How can I tell if an article is peer-reviewed?
A. There are several ways to determine if an article is refereed (peer-reviewed). The best way is to read the publisher's policies at the journal website (look for Peer Review or Editorial Policy, Submission or Author Guidelines). Ulrich's Global Serials Directory also indicates whether a journal is refereed/peer-reviewed. Beware that peer-reviewed journals also include content that is not peer reviewed, such as letters and book reviews. A peer-reviewed article will usually show a string of dates, usually either near the abstract or at the bottom of the 1st page of the PDF version or at the end of the article, showing when the article was submitted, revised, and accepted.
Databases may offer the ability to filter search results to display only peer-reviewed publications. Search engines, like Google Scholar, includes both peer-reviewed and "grey" literature that is not commercially published and may not be peer reviewed.
Think critically about the resources we are using and citing in our research. This leads to being responsible producers of information. While we may be seeking a peer-reviewed or scholarly information source, it's important to recognize bias and institutionalized oppressions that exist in the publication and dissemination of information. By definition, ACT UP means to act in a way that is different from normal. Use the prompts below to evaluate your information sources and ACT UP to create a more socially just information ecosystem.
A - Author. Who wrote the resource? Who are they? Background information matters.
C - Currency. When was this resource written? When was it published? Does this resource fit into the currency of your topic?
T - Truth. How accurate is this information? Can you verify any of the claims in other sources? Are there typos and spelling mistakes?
U - Unbiased. Is the information presented to sway the audience to a particular point of view? Resources unless otherwise stated should be impartial.
P - Privilege. Check the privilege of the author(s). Are they the only folks who might write or publish on this topic? Who is missing in this conversation? Critically evaluate the subject terms associated with each resource you found. How are they described? What are the inherent biases?
Stahura, Dawn. ACT UP for evaluating sources: Pushing against privilege. College & Research Libraries News, v. 79, n. 10, p. 551, Nov. 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.79.10.551.
Q. What is a primary source?
A. Primary documents are the original source materials.
In the sciences, lab data, lab notebooks, and original test protocols are considered primary documents. Source code and release notes, field observation notes or images are also primary documents. Journal articles are primary or first reports of research.
Q. What is a secondary source?
A. Secondary sources comment, analyze, or otherwise rely on primary sources.
Books, encyclopedias, and news articles are secondary sources because they describe what you will find in the primary sources.
Watch Pyrates: Truth be told for a perspective on primary sources in history!
![]() |